Global ETF AUM: $14.6T ▲ +18% YoY | Tokenized Fund AUM: $10.2B ▲ +340% Since 2023 | MiCA Enforcement: Jul 2026 ▼ Fund Provisions | SEC Spot BTC ETF: Jan 2024 ▲ 11 Approved | SEC Spot ETH ETF: May 2024 ▲ 9 Approved | Jurisdictions w/ Crypto ETF: 23 ▲ +7 in 2024 | On-Chain NAV Funds: 47 ▲ +22 YoY | DTCC Blockchain Pilots: 5 Active ▲ Settlement | Global ETF AUM: $14.6T ▲ +18% YoY | Tokenized Fund AUM: $10.2B ▲ +340% Since 2023 | MiCA Enforcement: Jul 2026 ▼ Fund Provisions | SEC Spot BTC ETF: Jan 2024 ▲ 11 Approved | SEC Spot ETH ETF: May 2024 ▲ 9 Approved | Jurisdictions w/ Crypto ETF: 23 ▲ +7 in 2024 | On-Chain NAV Funds: 47 ▲ +22 YoY | DTCC Blockchain Pilots: 5 Active ▲ Settlement |

Comparisons

Side-by-side regulatory and structural comparisons across jurisdictions and frameworks governing tokenized ETF products.

Last updated: March 22, 2026
IndicatorCurrentTargetStatus
Traditional vs Tokenized Authorized Participant Models——
CBDC vs Stablecoin Settlement for Tokenized Funds——
Tokenized vs Traditional ETF Tax Efficiency——
Regulatory Sandbox Approaches for Tokenized Funds——
Asia-Pacific Tokenized Fund Regulatory Comparison——
US vs EU Custody Requirements for Tokenized Funds——
SEC vs ESMA: Tokenized Fund Regulation Compared——

Institutional Access

Coming Soon